You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Potential welfare impacts of kill-trapping European moles ( Talpa europaea) using scissor traps and duffus traps: a post mortem examination study / About

Potential welfare impacts of kill-trapping European moles ( Talpa europaea) using scissor traps and duffus traps: a post mortem examination study

By S. E. Baker, R. F. Shaw, R. P. D. Atkinson, P. West, D. W. Macdonald

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Moles are widely trapped as pests on farms and amenity land in Britain. Spring traps for killing mammals generally require welfare approval in the UK, but mole traps are exempt. Previous research demonstrated wide variation in the mechanical performance of mole traps. In this context, we aimed to produce new data on the welfare impact of kill-trapping moles in the field. We collected 50 moles trapped in southern England (November 2008-August 2009). Captures peaked during the peak in male breeding activity, when captures were almost exclusively male. Post mortem and x-ray (radiation) examinations were conducted to determine injuries and likely cause of death. No moles sustained damaged skulls or upper cervical vertebrae (which could cause unconsciousness immediately). The primary identifiable cause of death for all but one mole was acute haemorrhage; this contrasts with the findings of the only previous such study, in which only one mole showed clear evidence of haemorrhaging. Some moles may have asphyxiated although it was not possible to determine this. Moles most likely became unconscious before death, but times to unconsciousness, and death, can be determined only through killing trials and further investigation is urgently needed. This should be done through the spring traps approval process; this could improve the welfare standards of trapping for many thousands of moles each year. Mole trapping for long-term population control might be better targeted after the peak in male breeding activity, when females are more likely to be caught, but this would threaten the welfare of dependent young underground.

Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 24
Issue 1
Pages 1-14
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
Publisher Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
Language English
Author Address Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX13 5QL, UK.sandra.baker@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal behavior
  2. Animals
  3. Animal welfare
  4. Biological resources
  5. British Isles
  6. Causality
  7. Commonwealth of Nations
  8. Developed countries
  9. Development
  10. Diseases and injuries of animals
  11. Europe
  12. Farms
  13. Fur-bearing animals
  14. Great Britain
  15. Hemorrhage
  16. Impact
  17. Insectivores
  18. Mammals
  19. OECD countries
  20. peer-reviewed
  21. postmortem examinations
  22. radiation
  23. Reproduction
  24. Rodents
  25. spine
  26. standards
  27. trapping
  28. trauma
  29. United Kingdom
  30. variation
  31. vertebrates
  32. Wild animals
  33. wildlife
  34. wildlife diseases
  35. wildlife management
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed