You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Using self-selection to evaluate the acceptance of a new diet formulation by farmed fish / About

Using self-selection to evaluate the acceptance of a new diet formulation by farmed fish

By H. Carlberg, Ken Cheng, T. Lundh, E. Brannas

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

The evaluation of new diet composition is commonly achieved by performing time-consuming growth trials, which may negatively impact the welfare of a large number of fish if the feed is not accepted. Instead, the fish's behavioural responses to a new diet composition can be used as a first step in the evaluation of new diet composition. The taste acceptance of a new diet by Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus) was evaluated over 16 days based on the self-selection of a test diet and a control diet. The test diet contained ingredients from the nutrient-enriched Baltic Sea, and it is hoped that this diet can contribute nutrients to the nutrient-poor waters in northern Sweden in which Arctic charr are farmed. The main ingredients in the test feed were blue mussel meat ( Mytilus edulis), meat from sprat ( Sprattus sprattus) and herring ( Clupea harengus), baker's yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae), fish oil and regionally produced rapeseed oil. Individual fish ( n=15) were allowed to choose between abundances of both the test diet and a fishmeal based control diet that mimicked a standard feed for Arctic charr. After only a few days, the fish demonstrated a significant preference for the Baltic Sea test feed. These results may depend on betaine, which was found at concentrations that were four times higher in the test feed than in the control feed. Betaine is a known attractant for many fish species and is abundant in marine animals, such as mussels. Thus, the test diet can be evaluated further without additional taste stimulants before the new feed formula can be used commercially to ensure fish welfare, the product quality and the economic feasibility of the new formula.

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 171
Pages 226-232
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.016
Language English
Author Address Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, 901 83 Umea, Sweden.hanna.carlberg@slu.se ken.cheng@slu.se torbjorn.lundh@slu.se eva.brannas@slu.se
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal behavior
  2. Animals
  3. Animal welfare
  4. Aquacultural and fisheries
  5. Developed countries
  6. Diets
  7. Europe
  8. Evaluation
  9. Feasibility
  10. Fish
  11. Fungi
  12. Invertebrates
  13. Marine animals
  14. Meals
  15. Mollusks
  16. mussels
  17. nutrients
  18. OECD countries
  19. Organisms
  20. peer-reviewed
  21. quality
  22. rapeseed
  23. Scandinavia
  24. shellfish
  25. Sweden
  26. taste
  27. vertebrates
  28. yeast
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed