The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Quality of life means welfare: how is it related to other concepts and assessed? / About

Quality of life means welfare: how is it related to other concepts and assessed?

By D. M. Broom

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Our view of which individuals should be the subjects of our moral actions is expanding to include more people and more species. Animal welfare is the subject of rapidly increasing concern in most countries in the world, and this concern is resulting in changes in the ways in which animal users keep and treat animals. Ethical decisions about whether the killing of an animal is justifiable should be considered separately from those about how poor welfare can be and still be acceptable. The term 'euthanasia' should be restricted to killing an animal for its own benefit Quality of life (QoL) in humans is generally taken to include: physical condition and any impairment of this resulting from injury or disease; capacity to function; perception of functioning; and satisfaction with functioning in relation to what is believed possible. If the welfare of an individual is its state as regards its attempts to cope with its environment, then welfare is essentially the same as QoL. Both include the state of the individual's coping systems, including those responding to pathology, various behavioural and physiological responses, and cognitive processes associated with suffering or pleasure. Hence, both welfare and QoL include health and the extent of positive and negative feelings. Many papers referring to animal welfare include objective quantification whilst few papers referring to QoL do so. Some human studies assess QoL by the less objective method of questions asked of subjects. Neither QoL nor welfare should be assessed using solely subjective measures. Assessment of welfare must take account of the wide variety of coping systems and coping strategies used. A range of measures including those of behaviour, physiology, brain function, immune system function, and damage is needed. The ease or difficulty of coping should be interpreted within the framework of the abilities of the animal. Animals with more sophisticated cognitive functioning may have the best abilities to cope with problems. The scheme presented here for assessing welfare over time facilitates ethical decisions regarding whether welfare is good or whether it is unacceptably poor.

Date 2007
Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 16
Issue Supplement
Pages 45-53
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
Language English
Author Address Centre for Animal Welfare and Anthrozoology, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK. dmb16@cam.ac.uk
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal physiology
  2. Animal rights
  3. Animal welfare
  4. Brain
  5. Cerebrum
  6. Diseases
  7. Ethics
  8. Euthanasia
  9. Health
  10. Immunity
  11. Mammals
  12. Methodologies
  13. Methods
  14. pathology
  15. peer-reviewed
  16. perceptions
  17. physiology
  18. Primates
  19. Quality of life
  20. Quantitative research
  21. Research
  22. Social psychology and social anthropology
  23. Studies
  24. Techniques
  25. trauma
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed