You are here: Home / Journal Articles / An evaluation of the physiological affects of anticipation, activity arousal and recovery in sprinting Greyhounds / About

An evaluation of the physiological affects of anticipation, activity arousal and recovery in sprinting Greyhounds

By Robert L. Gillette, T. Craig Angle, Jennifer S. Sanders, Fred J. DeGraves

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

This study was designed to separate the physically induced effects of activity from the psychologically induced effects of anticipation of activity. The purpose of this study was to determine if a psychological experience (i.e., activity anticipation) would cause a significant physiological reaction in athletic and working dogs. Physiological reaction to a psychological experience was determined by measuring physiological parameters (rectal temperature, pulse and respiration, TPR) of Greyhounds who were watching or running in a desired event comprised of intense work of short duration. The study was a cross-over design; twelve Greyhounds were split into two groups of six. On Day 1, a group of dogs chased a lure for 50m (i.e., Run Group), while other dogs watched (i.e., Watch Group) the Run Group dogs chase the lure. On Day 2, the previous day's Watch Group became the Run Group and the previous day's Run Group became the Watch Group. This procedure was repeated daily until each dog completed two running trials and two watching trials. Physiological parameters were obtained during resting, pre-exercise, post-exercise and 30min post-exercise. For all dogs of either group the anticipation of activity was associated with an increase in rectal temperature and heart rate from resting to pre-exercise. For the Watch Group, pre-exercise, post-exercise, and recovery heart rates were all significantly increased when compared to observations taken at rest (P

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 130
Issue 3
Pages 101-106
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.12.010
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Activity
  2. Dogs