The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

HabriCentral will be intermittently unavailable due to scheduled maintenance on Tuesday, January 19, 2021 starting at 11am ET. There will be some downtime of site features during the maintenance period. Please plan accordingly and we do apologize for any inconvenience. close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Pregnancy in goats does not influence intake of novel or familiar foods with or without toxins / About

Pregnancy in goats does not influence intake of novel or familiar foods with or without toxins

By B. F. R. Knubel, K. E. Panter, F. D. Provenza

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Some hypothesize that mammals decrease intake of foods that contain toxins during pregnancy to protect the fetus. We conducted a longitudinal study of feeding behavior to determine if pregnancy-related changes in food selection and intake occurred in goats. Goats eat modest amounts of toxic plants, some of which contain teratogenic or abortifacient compounds, but it is not known if pregnant and non-pregnant goats differ in food selection. The embryo is susceptible to toxins during all stages of pregnancy, but especially so during organogenesis early in pregnancy. Thus, we hypothesized that food selection and intake by pregnant versus non-pregnant goats may differ during various stages of pregnancy. We examined the following predictions that stem from this hypothesis: relative to non-pregnant goats, pregnant goats may alter selection of familiar foods that contain toxins, and of familiar and unfamiliar foods that do not contain toxins. We fed 14 plants with known or probable teratogenic properties during two pregnancies. We also offered beet pulp containing 0.5% LiCl during one pregnancy to test for increased sensitivity to toxins. In addition, we offered novel foods several times during one pregnancy to test for increased food neophobia or neophyllia. Finally, we measured intake of the basal ration by pregnant and non-pregnant goats daily throughout both pregnancies. Both pregnant and non-pregnant goats ate modest amounts of the plants with toxins and of beet pulp with LiCl. Both groups limited intake of novel foods and beet pulp with LiCl to the same degree. Finally, pregnant and non-pregnant goats did not differ in intake (per kg MBW) of the basal ration - dry matter, energy, or protein - in either pregnancy. Thus, the data do not support the notion that goats experienced pregnancy-related changes in food selection or intake.

Date 2004
Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 85
Issue 3/4
Pages 293-305
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.10.003
Language English
Author Address Institut fur Tierzucht und Tierhaltung mit Tierklinik, Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Adam-Kuckhoff-Str. 35, 06108 Halle, Germany. stan@cc.usu.edu
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal behavior
  2. Animal reproduction
  3. Behavior and behavior mechanisms
  4. Butterflies and moths
  5. Capra
  6. Corn
  7. Feeding behavior
  8. Feed intake
  9. Feed preferences
  10. Flowers
  11. Gestation
  12. Goats
  13. Grains
  14. Grasses
  15. Legumes
  16. Maize
  17. Mammals
  18. nicotine
  19. peer-reviewed
  20. pellets
  21. Plants
  22. Poisoning
  23. pregnancy
  24. Ruminants
  25. teratogens
  26. toxicology
  27. Toxins and toxicants
  28. vegetables
  29. Weeds and noxious plants
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed