The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Opening up for participation in agro-biodiversity conservation: the expert-lay interplay in a Brazilian social movement / About

Opening up for participation in agro-biodiversity conservation: the expert-lay interplay in a Brazilian social movement

By A. Delgado

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

In science and environmental studies, there is a general concern for the democratization of the expert-lay interplay. However, the democratization of expertise does not necessarily lead to more sustainable decisions. If citizens do not take the sustainable choice, what should experts and decision makers do? Should the expert-lay interplay be dissolved? In thinking about how to shape the expert-lay interplay in a better way in agro-biodiversity conservation, I take the case of the MST (Movimento Sem Terra/Landless People's Movement), possibly the largest rural movement in Latin America. The MST is in a process of turning towards environmentalism. It has adopted agroecology, a democratically oriented knowledge field. However, not all of the farmers were willing to adopt new environmentalist ideas and practices. Through ethnographic research, I analyze how expertise was recognized and redistributed within the MST, attending particularly to the role of MST coordinators and technicians. I explore how participation was framed and put into action. The adoption of agroecology brought to the MST a new and more inclusive map of expertise, but it also influenced new social distinctions within the communities. In part, farmers' knowledge was labeled as ignorance. This may close down possibilities for dialogue as well as for sustainability. The paper suggests that experts' power for discriminating among lay knowledges should come together with a responsibility for opening spaces for dialogue and action. One way of doing so could be by adding "interactional reflexivity" to experts' expertise.

Date 2008
Publication Title Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics
Volume 21
Issue 6
Pages 559-577
ISBN/ISSN 1187-7863
DOI 10.1007/s10806-008-9117-6
Language English
Author Address Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Biodiversity
  2. Biological resources
  3. Brazil
  4. Case Report
  5. Communities
  6. Conservation
  7. Developed countries
  8. Knowledge
  9. Latin America
  10. participation
  11. peer-reviewed
  12. rural areas
  13. Social psychology and social anthropology
  14. sociology
  15. South America
  16. sustainability
  17. Threshold Countries
  18. United States of America
  1. peer-reviewed