The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Developing the Ethical Matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. (Special Issue: Ethical tools.) / About

Developing the Ethical Matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. (Special Issue: Ethical tools.)

By M. Kaiser, K. Millar, E. Thorstensen, S. Tomkins

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

The Ethical Matrix was developed to help decision-makers explore the ethical issues raised by agri-food biotechnologies. Over the decade since its inception the Ethical Matrix has been used by a number of organizations and the philosophical basis of the framework has been discussed and analyzed extensively. The role of tools such as the Ethical Matrix in public policy decision-making has received increasing attention. In order to further develop the methodological aspects of the Ethical Matrix method, work was carried out to study the potential role of the Ethical Matrix as a decision support framework. When considering which frameworks to apply when analyzing the ethical dimensions of the application of agri-food biotechnologies, it is important to clarify the substantive nature of any prospective framework. In order to further investigate this issue, reflections on the neologism "ethical soundness" of an ethical framework are presented here. This concept is introduced in order to provide more structured evaluations of a range of ethical tools, including ethical frameworks such as the Ethical Matrix. As well as examining the philosophical dimensions of the method, theoretical analysis and literature studies were combined with stakeholder engagement exercises and consultations in order to review the Ethical Matrix from a user perspective. This work resulted in the development of an Ethical Matrix Manual, which is intended to act as a guide for potential user groups.

Date 2007
Publication Title Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics
Volume 20
Issue 1
Pages 65-80
ISBN/ISSN 1187-7863
DOI 10.1007/s10806-006-9023-8
Language English
Author Address National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT), P.O. Box 522, Sentrum, Prinsensgate 18, 0105, Oslo, Norway.
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Accountability
  2. Aquacultural and fisheries
  3. Biotechnology
  4. Case Report
  5. Choice
  6. Decision making
  7. Ethics
  8. Fish
  9. Genetically engineered animals
  10. Genetically modified animals
  11. Genetically modified organisms
  12. Genetic engineering
  13. Methodologies
  14. Methods
  15. peer-reviewed
  16. Social psychology and social anthropology
  17. Techniques
  18. transgenics
  1. peer-reviewed