The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Sustainable development and Norwegian genetic engineering regulations: applications, impacts, and challenges / About

Sustainable development and Norwegian genetic engineering regulations: applications, impacts, and challenges

By A. I. Myhr, T. Traavik

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

The main purpose of The Norwegian Gene Technology Act (1993) is to enforce containment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and control of GMO releases. Furthermore, the Act intends to ensure that "production and use of GMOs should take place in an ethically and socially justifiable way, in accordance with the principle of sustainable development and without detrimental effects to health and the environment." Hence it is obvious that, for the Norwegian authorities, sustainable development is a normative guideline when evaluating acceptable consequences of GMO use and production. In accordance with this, we have investigated the extent to which the sustainability criteria were decisive for the destiny of one approved and one declined application of genetically modified plant release. The present understanding of the ecological, socio-economical, and cultural consequences of GMO use and release is fragmentary and uncertain. We consider the Precautionary Principle and the notion of equitable distribution as key issues within the sustainable development framework, hence constituting important foundations for our analyses. The Act is legitimizing sustainability criteria, but does not seem to secure their conversion into concrete action. We envisage a more conscious implementation of the Norwegian Gene Technology Act. Sustainability concerns ecological, economical, and social values, and these can only be ensured through long-term thinking, initiation of independent risk-associated research, and broad involvement of all stakeholders in the evaluation of GMO issues and concerns.

Date 2003
Publication Title Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics
Volume 16
Issue 4
Pages 317-335
ISBN/ISSN 1187-7863
DOI 10.1023/A:1025616015955
Language English
Author Address Department of Microbiology and Virology, University of Tromso, Norwegian Institute of Gene Ecology, N-9037 Tromso, Norway. annem@fagmed.uit.no
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Agriculture
  2. Bioethics
  3. Biotechnology
  4. Crops
  5. Developed countries
  6. Economics
  7. Environment
  8. Europe
  9. Flowers
  10. Genetically engineered organisms
  11. Genetically engineered plants
  12. Genetically modified organisms
  13. Genetic engineering
  14. Genetic manipulation
  15. Guidelines
  16. Horticulture
  17. Laws and regulations
  18. Marketing
  19. natural resources
  20. Norway
  21. OECD countries
  22. peer-reviewed
  23. Plants
  24. rape
  25. recommendations
  26. regulations
  27. risk
  28. rules
  29. Scandinavia
  30. Social psychology and social anthropology
  31. socioeconomics
  32. sustainability
  33. Sweden
  34. transgenics
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed