You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Exploiting abstract possibilities: a critique of the concept and practice of product patenting / About

Exploiting abstract possibilities: a critique of the concept and practice of product patenting

By H. Radder

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

Developments in biotechnology and genomics have moved the issue of patenting scientific and technological inventions toward the centre of interest. In particular, the patentability of genes of plants, animals, or humans and of genetically modified (parts of) living organisms has been discussed, and questioned, from various normative perspectives. This paper aims to contribute to this debate. For this purpose, it first explains a number of relevant aspects of the theory and practice of patenting. The focus is on a special and increasingly significant type of patents, namely product patents. The paper provides three general arguments against the concept and practice of product patenting. The first argument briefly considers the claim that patents are legitimate because they promote socially useful innovation. Against this claim, it is argued that product patents may hamper rather than promote such innovation. The second and main argument concludes that product patents are not adequately based on actual technological inventions, as they should be according to the usual criteria of patentability. The principal moral issue is that product patents tend to reward patentees for inventions they have not really made available. The final argument proposes a method for patenting the heat of the sun. Assuming that granting this patent will be generally considered absurd, the argument exposes a further, fundamental problem of the concept and practice of product patenting.

Date 2004
Publication Title Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics
Volume 17
Issue 3
Pages 275-291
ISBN/ISSN 1187-7863
DOI 10.1023/B:JAGE.0000033080.99746.da
Language English
Author Address Faculty of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Animal genetics
  2. Biotechnology
  3. Genes
  4. Genetics
  5. Mammals
  6. patents
  7. peer-reviewed
  8. Plants
  9. Primates
  10. Protection
  11. technology
  1. peer-reviewed