You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers / About

Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers

By D. J. Colburn, Gene H. Deutscher, Merlyn K. Nielsen, Don C. Adams

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

A study was conducted over 3 yr to evaluate effects of sire birth weight EPD, calf birth weight and shape, and heifer pelvic area and weight, individually and in combination, on dystocia and subsequent rebreeding of 2-yr-old heifers. Heifers (n = 550), MARC II yearlings, were assigned for breeding to one of four Angus sires with birth weight EPD of -.95, -.82, +2.9, and +2.7 kg. At calving, heifers were assisted as needed. A gauge attached to the calf puller recorded applied traction pressure. Analysis of traction pressure detected only slightly larger amounts of variation (2 to 3%) affecting dystocia than the standard five-point scoring system. Dam weight did not affect calving difficulty score (CDS), except dam birth weights were heavier ( P < .05) for CDS 5 (Caesarean section) than CDS 1 (unassisted). Dams requiring Caesarean section had smaller pelvic areas ( P < .05), with no other differences among CDS. The CDS increased as calf birth weight and calf external measurements increased. Low EPD sires produced calves with smaller ( P < .05) birth weights and smaller calf head and foot circumferences and caused less dystocia than high EPD sires. The CDS did not affect subsequent pregnancy rates but did affect conception date of the second calf. Calves delivered by Caesarean section were lighter ( P < .05) at weaning than other calves but had similar slaughter weights. As mean winter temperature increased (6.1°C) from yr 1 to 3, calf birth weight decreased (4.6 kg) and calving difficulty decreased 23%. Results indicate sire birth weight EPD, calf birth weight and shape, dam pelvic area, and climate affected CDS, and CDS affected subsequent conception date.

Submitter

Megan Kendall

Purdue University

Date 1997
Publication Title Journal of Animal Science
Volume 75
Issue January
Pages 1469–1476
Publisher American Society of Animal Science
URL http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1510&context=animalscifacpub
Language English
Notes This article was found at Digital Commons @ the University of Nebraska-Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal roles
  2. Animal welfare
  3. Body condition
  4. Calves
  5. Cattle
  6. Environmental research
  7. Farm animals
  8. Health
  9. Nutrition
  10. Physical environment
  11. sires
  12. slaughter
  13. weaning