You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Hygiene measures for animal-assisted interventions in hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals and retirement homes / About

Hygiene measures for animal-assisted interventions in hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals and retirement homes

By C. Hoffmann, C. Herr, T. Eikmann

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Active or passive interactions with animals in animal-assisted interventions can be of great physical (reduction of hypertension, cardiac and circulatory troubles, muscle relaxation, pain relief etc.) and psychosocial (reduction of loneliness, fear and hostility, improvement of self-confidence) benefit for patients. Since not all animal species are suitable for animal-assisted interventions, guidelines with regard to the animal species, the breed, origin, behaviour, age and the state of health should be compiled. In addition, with the primarily used animals (dogs and cats) certain basic conditions must be considered (minimum age, training etc.). Several potential risks are commonly stated as arguments against the use of therapy animals in the medical field (eg, transmission of infectious diseases, contact to ecto- and endoparasites, causing an increase of allergies). To minimize the risk of infection, general constraints must be considered concerning the animal itself: vaccination, appropriate flea, tick and enteric parasite control program etc., the treatment rooms as well as to the staff and the patients. Especially for treatment of immunocompromised patients the general conditions have to be strictly defined. However, a general contact ban is not necessary. The requirements stated above are essentially also valid to pet keeping at retirement homes. Treatment in medical and dentist's practise can be considered a special problem and should be avoided as far as possible due to a the great number of uncertainty factors and people involved (guide dogs excepted). Once specific basic rules are considered animal supported therapy or contact to pets in health care settings does not appear to pose any greater risk to (immunocompromised) patients than would interactions with other people or the environment. Misconceptions about the transmission of infectious diseases by animals may cause families to get rid of their pets unnecessarily once new diagnoses are found. It can be much more harmful for the well-being and the health of immunocompromised patients to lose the contact with a beloved domestic animal than to potentially risk acquiring a zoonotic infection. In order to ensure best possible legal certainty concerning animal presence in health care settings every institution should have a plan of action at the disposal of staff and patients with the therapy animal, describing measures suitable for prevention of infectious diseases, restrictions of access for the animals, i.e. to treatment rooms as well as disinfection measures in a specific hygiene plan. Furthermore the vaccinations and the treatment with topical parasiticides have to be individually documented for each animal.

Date 2010
Publication Title Umweltmedizin in Forschung und Praxis
Volume 15
Issue 3
Pages 149-157
ISBN/ISSN 1430-8681
Language German
Author Address Institut fur Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitatsklinikum Giessen und Marburg GmbH, Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Friedrichstrasse 16, 35392 Giessen, Germany. christiane.hoffmann@hygiene.med.uni-giessen.de
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Allergy
  2. Arthropods
  3. Cats
  4. Chemotherapy
  5. Communicable disease
  6. Control
  7. Diseases
  8. Dogs
  9. Domestic animals
  10. Drug therapy
  11. Environment
  12. Exposure
  13. Fleas
  14. Health care
  15. Health protection
  16. Health services
  17. Hospitals
  18. Humans
  19. Hygiene
  20. Immune sensitization
  21. Immunization
  22. Immunocompromised hosts
  23. Infectious diseases
  24. Insects
  25. Invertebrates
  26. Mammals
  27. Medical care
  28. Metastigmata
  29. Mites
  30. Parasites
  31. Parasitic diseases
  32. parasitic infestations
  33. pathogens
  34. patient care
  35. peer-reviewed
  36. Pesticides and Drugs
  37. Pets and companion animals
  38. Primates
  39. Resistance and Immunity
  40. retirement homes
  41. Reviews
  42. risk
  43. spiders
  44. therapeutics
  45. therapy
  46. vaccination
  47. Zoonoses
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed