The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Cognitive bias in a non-human primate: husbandry procedures influence cognitive indicators of psychological well-being in captive rhesus macaques / About

Cognitive bias in a non-human primate: husbandry procedures influence cognitive indicators of psychological well-being in captive rhesus macaques

By E. J. Bethell, A. Holmes, A. MacLarnon, S. Semple

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

The measurement of 'cognitive bias' has recently emerged as a powerful tool for assessing animal welfare. Cognitive bias was initially, and widely, studied in humans, and describes the way in which particular emotions are associated with biases in information processing. People suffering from clinical levels of anxiety or depression, for example, interpret ambiguous events more negatively than do non-anxious or non-depressed people. Development of methods for use with non-human animals has revealed similar biases in several species of mammals and birds, and one invertebrate. However, cognitive bias has not been previously explored in any species of non-human primate, despite specific concerns raised about the welfare of these animals in captivity. Here, we describe a touchscreen-based cognitive-bias task developed for use with captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Monkeys were initially trained on a 'Go/No-Go' operant task, in which they learned to touch one of two lines that differed in size in order to receive a reward (food), and to desist from touching the other line to avoid a mildly aversive stimulus (delay to the next trial and white noise). In testing sessions, the monkeys were presented with lines of intermediate size. We measured whether touchscreen responses to these ambiguous stimuli were affected by husbandry procedures (environmental enrichment, and a statutory health check involving restraint and ketamine hydrochloride injection) presumed to induce positive and negative shifts in affective state, respectively. Monkeys made fewer responses to ambiguous stimuli post health check compared to during the phase of enrichment suggesting greater expectation of negative outcomes following the health check compared to during enrichment. Shifts in affective state following standard husbandry procedures may therefore be associated with changes in information processing similar to those demonstrated in anxious and depressed humans, and in a number of other taxa.

Date 2012
Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 21
Issue 2
Pages 185-195
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
DOI 10.7120/09627286.21.2.185
URL https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/8275
Language English
Author Address School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, James Parsons Building, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.E.J.Bethell@ljmu.ac.uk
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Anesthesia
  2. Animal husbandry
  3. Animal rights
  4. Animals
  5. Animal welfare
  6. Birds
  7. Enrichment
  8. Environment
  9. Health
  10. Humans
  11. Husbandry
  12. Indicators
  13. Information
  14. Information processing
  15. Ketamine
  16. Macaques
  17. Mammals
  18. Measurement
  19. Men
  20. Metrology
  21. Monkeys
  22. neuroactive drugs
  23. neurotropic drugs
  24. Noise
  25. open access
  26. peer-reviewed
  27. Primates
  28. restraint
  29. Techniques
  30. toxicology
Badges
  1. open access
  2. peer-reviewed