You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Behaviour and welfare of veal calves fed different amounts of solid feed supplemented to a milk replacer ration adjusted for similar growth / About

Behaviour and welfare of veal calves fed different amounts of solid feed supplemented to a milk replacer ration adjusted for similar growth

By L. E. Webb, E. A. M. Bokkers, B. Engel, W. J. J. Gerrits, H. Berends, C. G. van Reenen

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

Veal calves in Europe are typically fed large quantities of milk replacer and small amounts of solid feed, a diet known to lead to the development of abnormal oral behaviours in these animals. These abnormal oral behaviours are thought to be an indication of frustration, chronic stress, and hence poor welfare. The present study investigated how different feeding strategies, differing in solid feed and milk replacer provision, affected the behaviour and welfare of veal calves across time. Four treatment groups (A–D) comprising of 12 Holstein–Friesian bull calves each (7.6 ± 0.1 weeks old and 54.7 ± 0.3 kg at arrival), penned in groups of three, were fed one of four amounts of a solid feed mixture, i.e. 50% concentrates, 25% fresh maize silage, and 25% wheat straw (on dry matter [DM] basis): A = 0, B = 9, C = 18, and D = 27 g DM/kg0.75/d. Provision of milk replacer was adjusted to achieve similar average daily gain across treatments. Behaviour was recorded around feeding (10 min continuous focal observations of individual calves) and throughout the day (7 sessions of 30 min scan sampling at 5 min interval every 2 h from 06:30 h) every week for four months. In an attempt to find an easy practical method to measure behavioural response to feeding strategy, two 3-min behavioural tests were carried out: (1) in months 1 and 3, calves were presented with a ball and latency to make oral contact with it was recorded; and (2) in month 1, calves were presented with an overall and time spent orally manipulating (i.e. chewing or licking) it was recorded using scan sampling every 10 s. Calves in treatment D displayed less abnormal oral behaviours around feeding, less tongue playing throughout the day, and more chewing in the first two months, compared to treatment A. Treatment B only led to lower tongue playing levels compared to A and treatment C had no benefit in terms of reducing abnormal oral behaviours. Although a solid feed dose–response was expected on the display of abnormal behaviours in veal calves, treatment C did not fit within this expectation. These findings point to a more complex relationship between solid feed and abnormal oral behaviour frequency in veal calves. The two behavioural tests distinguished the different treatments as expected, and thus showed a solid feed dose–response. Because of an increase in chewing and ruminating efficiency over time, amounts of solid feed should be increased with age to maintain high levels of chewing and ruminating. Moreover, high levels of chewing and ruminating may have to be maintained long enough at the beginning of the fattening period to lead to a reduction in abnormal oral behaviours.

Date 2011
Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 136
Issue 2
Pages 108-116
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
Publisher Elsevier
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.12.004
Language English
Author Address Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen,
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Angiosperms
  2. Animal behavior
  3. animal breed
  4. Animal genetics
  5. Animal nutrition
  6. Animals
  7. Behavior and behavior mechanisms
  8. Bovidae
  9. Calves
  10. Cattle
  11. Chewing
  12. Concentrates
  13. Corn
  14. Dog Breeds
  15. Europe
  16. Fat
  17. Feeding
  18. Feeds
  19. Field crops
  20. Finishing
  21. Flowers
  22. Grains
  23. Grasses
  24. Latency
  25. Liveweight gains
  26. Maize
  27. Mammals
  28. peer-reviewed
  29. performance traits
  30. Plants
  31. proteins
  32. Ruminants
  33. Straw
  34. tongue
  35. ungulates
  1. peer-reviewed