The HABRI Central Team continues to monitor emerging research and information about the COVID-19 pandemic. Visit our collection of resources, https://habricentral.org/features/covid-19 close

 
You are here: Home / Books / Property, people, or pets? / About

Property, people, or pets?

By Fiery Cushman, Marc D. Hauser, Matt Kamen, Alan M. Beck (editor)

View Resource (PDF)

Licensed under

Category Books
Abstract

A child can't be owned, but parents are legally responsible for their child's care. A painting and a dog can be owned; both fall under the jurisdiction of the law and in particular, property rights. But why should a dog, man's best friend, an animal with a mind and emotions, fall under the same category as a painting? How could the law be so foolish? Requiring legal guardianship for animals would have radical consequences for how we live our lives.

Submitter

Deborah Maron

Date 2006
Pages 243
Series Title New Directions in the Human-Animal Bond
ISBN/ISSN 1-55753-380-6
Publisher Purdue University Press
Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal rights
  2. Animal roles
  3. Books
  4. Laboratory and experimental animals
  5. Pets and companion animals