HABRI Central - Resources: "Nobody Wants to Eat Them Alive:" Ethical Dilemmas and Dual Media Narratives on Domestic Rabbits as Pets and Commodity: About

The Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) is issuing a call for research proposals from institutions and organizations across the globe to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted interventions (AAI), both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Conference Proceedings / "Nobody Wants to Eat Them Alive:" Ethical Dilemmas and Dual Media Narratives on Domestic Rabbits as Pets and Commodity / About

"Nobody Wants to Eat Them Alive:" Ethical Dilemmas and Dual Media Narratives on Domestic Rabbits as Pets and Commodity

By Gayane F. Torosyan, Brian Lowe

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Conference Proceedings
Abstract

Using semiotic analysis, this study explores changes occurring in the societal perception of rabbits as farm animals as juxtaposed to their increasing popularity as domestic companions. This study is based on a preliminary hypothesis that rabbits are increasingly perceived and portrayed in media as domestic companion animals similar to cats and guinea pigs, which challenges a parallel narrative that views rabbits as commodities for their meat and fur. Operating within a theoretical framework that considers news media as both socially constructed reality and recorded history, the study examines the dynamics of change in numbers of coded news narratives drawn as a 1000-piece convenience sample from a database of news stories published worldwide between 1990 and 2011.

Submitter

Katie Carroll

Date 2013
Volume 2012
Publisher New York State Communication Association
Conference Title Proceedings of the 70th New York State Communication Association
URL http://docs.rwu.edu/nyscaproceedings/vol2012/iss1/9/
Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal roles
  2. Animal welfare
  3. Domestic animals
  4. Food animals
  5. Mammals
  6. Pet ownership
  7. Pets and companion animals
  8. rabbits
  9. Rodents