You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Lost and hound: the more-than-human networks of rural policing / About

Lost and hound: the more-than-human networks of rural policing

By R. Yarwood

Category Journal Articles

The rhetoric of community is widely deployed in rural policing but can be problematic for three main reasons. The idea of community can exclude as well as include; be used as a way of shifting responsibility for policing away from the state and sometimes produces insular, bounded views of places. In response to these concerns, this paper uses a relational approach to re-conceptualise rural policing as a networked activity that enrolls various actors to produce different forms of policing in different places. To illustrate the potential of this approach it considers how various agencies are drawn into searches for missing people in the countryside. It pays particular attention to non-human agencies, specifically search-dogs handled by volunteers, in searches for missing people. As well as broadening empirical and conceptual knowledge of rural policing, the paper also contributes to wider debates in rural studies about the place of animals, and especially working dogs, in the countryside.

Publication Title Journal of Rural Studies
Volume 39
Pages 278-286
ISBN/ISSN 0743-0167
DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.005
Language English
Author Address School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon,
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Animals
  2. British Isles
  3. Canidae
  4. Canine
  5. Carnivores
  6. Commonwealth
  7. Countries
  8. Crime
  9. Developed countries
  10. Dogs
  11. Europe
  12. Law Enforcement
  13. Mammals
  14. OECD countries
  15. peer-reviewed
  16. prevention
  17. rural areas
  18. Rural Population
  19. United Kingdom
  20. vertebrates
  21. Working animals
  1. peer-reviewed