The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Long-term effects of straw blocks in pens with finishing pigs and the interaction with boar type / About

Long-term effects of straw blocks in pens with finishing pigs and the interaction with boar type

By A. Bulens, S. van Beirendonck, J. van Thielen, N. Buys, B. Driessen

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

This study verified the effect of straw blocks on the behavior and growth of finishing pigs and possible interactions with the genetic background (boar type). A total of 359 finishing pigs, which were offspring from different boar types, were housed in gender-mixed pens with slatted floors. Half of these pigs descended from sires selected for better carcass traits and lower growth rates (type C) and the other half from sires selected for better growth and poorer carcass traits (type G). The offspring of these two boar types were spread equally over control (only a chain) and treatment groups (chain and straw blocks in a dispenser). Direct individual behavioral observations were carried out once a week and the presence of lesions on the body was verified every two weeks. Individual weights were recorded at different weighing moments. Lesions on organs and carcass traits were obtained after slaughter. A lower frequency of pen mate manipulation was observed in pens with access to straw blocks in type G pigs. For type C pigs however, no significant difference was present in pen mate manipulation between groups with or without straw. It has been shown that pigs selected for high lean tissue growth rate show higher frequencies of tail biting behavior and in this study, providing straw blocks does not seem to be sufficient to decrease this behavior. These pigs also showed more pen manipulation, which might reflect an increased foraging motivation or motivation to explore. Mounting and fighting were recorded more frequently at the start of the finishing phase and in this period significantly more in pens with straw blocks, which might be related to both competition for straw and introduction in a new environment. Growth was not significantly affected by the presence of straw blocks. Type G pigs however reached higher slaughter weights compared to type C pigs, but no interaction with the presence of straw was seen. It can be concluded that in general, straw blocks decreased the manipulation of pen mates in finishing pigs, but this effect was only seen in pigs selected for better growth. Pigs predisposed to a higher lean meat percentage showed in general higher frequencies of this behavior and in these pigs, straw blocks did not reduce pen mate manipulation compared to more barren environments. In general, the presence of the straw blocks seemed to be associated with more competition related behavior in the beginning of the fattening period. The presence of straw did not affect growth or carcass traits.

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 176
Pages 6-11
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.008
Language English
Author Address Group Animal & Welfare, Bioengineering Technology TC, KU Leuven, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440 Geel,
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Animal behavior
  2. Animal nutrition
  3. Animals
  4. Boars
  5. Breeding
  6. Carcasses
  7. Crossbreds
  8. Effect
  9. Finishing
  10. Floors
  11. Foraging
  12. Growth rates
  13. Guinea pigs
  14. Interactions
  15. Lesions
  16. Mammals
  17. Meat.
  18. peer-reviewed
  19. pens
  20. performance traits
  21. Pigs
  22. progeny
  23. quality
  24. Rodents
  25. Straw
  26. Suiformes
  27. traits
  28. ungulates
  29. vertebrates
  1. peer-reviewed