The HABRI Central Team continues to monitor emerging research and information about the COVID-19 pandemic. Visit our collection of resources, https://habricentral.org/features/covid-19 close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Countering brutality to wildlife, relationism and ethics: conservation, welfare and the 'ecoversity'. (Special issue: Minding animals: Emerging issues concerning our relationships with other animals.) / About

Countering brutality to wildlife, relationism and ethics: conservation, welfare and the 'ecoversity'. (Special issue: Minding animals: Emerging issues concerning our relationships with other animals.)

By S. Garlick, J. Matthews, J. Carter

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Wildlife objectification and cruelty are everyday aspects of Australian society that eschew values of human kindness, empathy, and an understanding of the uniqueness and importance of non-human life in the natural world. Fostered by institutional failure, greed and selfishness, and the worst aspects of human disregard, the objectification of animals has its roots in longstanding Western anthropocentric philosophical perspectives, post colonialism, and a global uptake of neoliberal capitalism. Conservation, animal rights and welfare movements have been unable to stem the ever-growing abuse of wildlife, while 'greenwash' language such as 'resource use', 'management', 'pests', 'over-abundance', 'conservation hunting' and 'ecology' coat this violence with a respectable public veneer. We propose an engaged learning approach to address the burgeoning culture of wildlife cruelty and objectification that comprises three elements: a relational ethic based on intrinsic understanding of the way wildlife and humans might view each other [1-3]; geography of place and space [4], where there are implications for how we ascribe contextual meaning and practice in human-animal relations; and, following [5], engaged learning designed around our ethical relations with others, beyond the biophysical and novel and towards the reflective metaphysical. We propose the 'ecoversity' [6], as a scholarly and practical tool for focusing on the intersection of these three elements as an ethical place-based learning approach to wildlife relationism. We believe it provides a mechanism to help bridge the gap between human and non-human animals, conservation and welfare, science and understanding, and between objectification and relationism as a means of addressing entrenched cruelty to wildlife.

Date 2011
Publication Title Animals
Volume 1
Issue 1
Pages 161-175
ISBN/ISSN 2076-2615
Language English
Author Address Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia. jmatthew@usc.edu.au jcarter@usc.edu.au sgarlick@msn.com.au
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal ecology
  2. Animal rights
  3. Animal welfare
  4. APEC countries
  5. Australasia
  6. Australia
  7. Biological resources
  8. Commonwealth of Nations
  9. Developed countries
  10. Ethics
  11. Mammals
  12. Oceania
  13. OECD countries
  14. peer-reviewed
  15. Primates
  16. Wild animals
  17. wildlife
  18. wildlife conservation
  19. wildlife management
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed