HABRI Central - Resources: Human-animal interactions and safety during dairy cattle handling - comparing moving cows to milking and hoof trimming: About

The Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) is issuing a call for research proposals from institutions and organizations across the globe to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted interventions (AAI), both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Human-animal interactions and safety during dairy cattle handling - comparing moving cows to milking and hoof trimming / About

Human-animal interactions and safety during dairy cattle handling - comparing moving cows to milking and hoof trimming

By C. Lindahl, S. Pinzke, A. Herlin, L. J. Keeling

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Cattle handling is a dangerous activity on dairy farms, and cows are a major cause of injuries to livestock handlers. Even if dairy cows are generally tranquil and docile, when situations occur that they perceive or remember as aversive, they may become agitated and hazardous to handle. This study aimed to compare human-animal interactions, cow behavior, and handler safety when moving cows to daily milking and moving cows to more rarely occurring and possibly aversive hoof trimming. These processes were observed on 12 Swedish commercial dairy farms. The study included behavioral observations of handler and cows and cow heart rate recordings, as well as recording frequencies of situations and incidents related to an increased injury risk to the handler. At milking, cows were quite easily moved using few interactions. As expected, the cows showed no behavioral signs of stress, fear, or resistance and their heart rate only rose slightly from the baseline (i.e., the average heart rate during an undisturbed period before handling). Moving cows to hoof trimming involved more forceful and gentle interactions compared with moving cows to milking. Furthermore, the cows showed much higher frequencies of behaviors indicative of aversion and fear (e.g., freezing, balking, and resistance), as well as a higher increase in heart rate. The risk of injury to which handlers were exposed also increased when moving cows to hoof trimming rather than to routine milking. Some interactions (such as forceful tactile interactions with an object and pulling a neck strap or halter) appeared to be related to potentially dangerous incidents where the handler was being kicked, head-butted, or run over by a cow. In conclusion, moving cows to hoof trimming resulted in higher frequencies of behaviors indicating fear, more forceful interactions, and increased injury risks to the handler than moving cows to milking. Improving potentially stressful handling procedures (e.g., by better animal handling practices and preparation of cows to cope with such procedures) can increase handler safety, animal welfare, ease of handling, and efficiency.

Date 2016
Publication Title Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 99
Issue 3
Pages 2131-2141
ISBN/ISSN 0022-0302
DOI 10.3168/jds.2014-9210
Language English
Author Address Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 88, SE-230 53, Alnarp, Sweden.Cecilia.Lindahl@jti.se
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Agriculture
  2. Animal husbandry
  3. Animals
  4. Animal welfare
  5. Bovidae
  6. Cattle
  7. Countries
  8. Dairy animals
  9. Developed countries
  10. Europe
  11. Food science
  12. Freezing
  13. Heart
  14. Heart rate
  15. Injuries
  16. Interactions
  17. Livestock
  18. Mammals
  19. Milk and dairy products
  20. milking
  21. OECD countries
  22. open access
  23. peer-reviewed
  24. Production
  25. Ruminants
  26. Scandinavia
  27. Science
  28. Stress
  29. Sweden
  30. trauma
  31. ungulates
  32. vertebrates
  33. Veterinary sciences
Badges
  1. open access
  2. peer-reviewed