You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Animal ethics profiling of vegetarians, vegans and meat-eaters / About

Animal ethics profiling of vegetarians, vegans and meat-eaters

By T. B. Lund, D. E. F. McKeegan, C. Cribbin, P. Sandoe

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

The aims of this study were to identify the animal ethical profile of vegetarians, vegans, and meat-eaters. Using questionnaire data collected in 2013 (n=356), we measured propensity to subscribe to five different positions within animal ethics based on a novel measure of animal ethical stance (adopted from the "Animal Ethics Dilemma" learning tool). We found clear relationships between diet choice and ethical profile. The responses of meat-eaters indicated that they were relying on a mixture of ethical positions (relational, respect for nature, contractarian, and animal rights), but predominantly the utilitarian position. Propensity to hold animal rights and relational views increased with the number of meat products not consumed by meat-eaters. Vegans and vegetarians revealed more consistent animal ethics viewpoints, especially the vegan group which had a very high propensity to hold an animal rights position. Vegetarians were also inclined to hold the animal rights position, but additionally had a tendency to draw on utilitarian reasoning. Subscription to animal rights views was a defining characteristic of vegans regardless of the number of years they had followed the diet, while this was not the case for vegetarians. Contrary to expectations, the number of years a vegetarian diet had been followed was not positively associated with animal rights views. This study should be followed up in a larger and more representative population, but it is the first to attempt to quantitatively profile vegetarians, vegans, and meat-eaters across a range of animal ethics frameworks. We argue that the novel approach used in this study to assess animal ethics stances could be applied to a wide range of animal-related activities.

Publication Title Anthrozoƶs
Volume 29
Issue 1
Pages 89-106
ISBN/ISSN 0892-7936
DOI 10.1080/08927936.2015.1083192
Language English
Author Address Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Agriculture
  2. Animals
  3. Animal welfare
  4. Anthrozoology
  5. Diets
  6. Ethics
  7. Food science
  8. Humans
  9. Mammals
  10. Meat.
  11. Meat production
  12. Men
  13. Nutrition
  14. Primates
  15. Psychiatry and psychology
  16. Questionnaires
  17. Social psychology and social anthropology
  18. Vegetarianism and veganism
  19. vertebrates
  20. Veterinary sciences