You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Polar Similar: Intersections of Anthropology and Conservation / About

Polar Similar: Intersections of Anthropology and Conservation

By Nathan Poirier, Sarah Tomasello

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

Anthropologists and conservationists have a long history of conflict, largely stemming from the creation of protected areas that are frequently placed on the land belonging to Indigenous communities for which anthropologists advocate. While this paper does not wish to diminish the values of either group regarding this conflict, it argues that anthropologists and conservationists actually have much to agree upon. The industrocentric paradigm, which places great value on continuous growth and profit, is increasingly degrading the land and threatening both the humans and nonhumans who sustain off of it. Not only do activities such as mining, logging, and globalized agriculture pollute waterways, decimate valuable forest habitat, and facilitate the poaching of a number of species, but they also destroy the homes and impinge upon the lifeways of various human populations who rely on the land and the species that live there for survival. Recognizing that industry is a common adversary of both humans and nonhumans opens up possibilities of bringing people together for a mutual cause.


Katie Carroll

Date 2017
Publication Title Animalia
Publisher Canisius College
Language English
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Animal roles
  2. Animals in culture
  3. Animal welfare
  4. Anthropology
  5. Conservation
  6. Ecosystems
  7. Habitats
  8. Nature
  9. Protection