The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / A One Health Evaluation of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance / About

A One Health Evaluation of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance

By Marie C. E. Hanin, Kevin Queenan, Sara Savic, Esron Karimuribo, Simon R. Ruegg, Barbara Hasler

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Rooted in the recognition that emerging infectious diseases occur at the interface of human, animal, and ecosystem health, the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance (SACIDS) initiative aims to promote a trans-sectoral approach to address better infectious disease risk management in five countries of the Southern African Development Community. Nine years after SACIDS’ inception, this study aimed to evaluate the program by applying a One Health (OH) evaluation framework developed by the Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH). The evaluation included a description of the context and the initiative, illustration of the theory of change, identification of outputs and outcomes, and assessment of the One Healthness. The latter is the sum of characteristics that defines an integrated approach and includes OH thinking, OH planning, OH working, sharing infrastructure, learning infrastructure, and systemic organization. The protocols made available by NEOH were used to develop data collection protocols and identify the study design. The framework relies on a mixed methods approach by combining a descriptive and qualitative assessment with a semi-quantitative evaluation (scoring). Data for the analysis were gathered during a document review, in group and individual interviews and in an online survey. Operational aspects (i.e., OH thinking, planning, and working) were found to be balanced overall with the highest score in the planning dimension, whereas the infrastructure (learning infrastructure, systemic organization, and sharing infrastructure) was high for the first two dimensions, but low for sharing. The OH index calculated was 0.359, and the OH ratio calculated was 1.495. The program was praised for its great innovative energy in a difficult landscape dominated by poor infrastructure and its ability to create awareness for OH and enthuse people for the concept; training of people and networking. Shortcomings were identified regarding the balance of contributions, funds and activities across member countries in the South, lack of data sharing, unequal allocation of resources, top-down management structures, and limited horizontal collaboration. Despite these challenges, SACIDS is perceived to be an effective agent in tackling infectious diseases in an integrated manner.

Submitter

Katie Osborn

Publication Title Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Volume 5
Issue 33
Pages 16
ISBN/ISSN 2297-1769
Publisher Frontiers
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2018.00033
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2018.00033/full
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Marie C. E. Hanin; Kevin Queenan; Sara Savic; Esron Karimuribo; Simon R. Ruegg; Barbara Hasler (2018), "A One Health Evaluation of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance," https://habricentral.org/resources/62277.

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags
  1. Evaluation
  2. Health
  3. Infectious diseases
  4. One Health
  5. open access
  6. peer review
Badges
  1. open access
  2. peer review