The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Can mental health interventions change social networks? A systematic review / About

Can mental health interventions change social networks? A systematic review

By Kimberly Anderson, Neelam Laxhman, Stefan Priebe

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Background

Social networks of patients with psychosis can provide social support, and improve health and social outcomes, including quality of life. However, patients with psychosis often live rather isolated with very limited social networks. Evidence for interventions targeting symptoms or social skills, are largely unsuccessful at improving social networks indirectly. As an alternative, interventions may directly focus on expanding networks. In this systematic review, we assessed what interventions have previously been tested for this and to what extent they have been effective.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted of randomised controlled trials, testing psychosocial interventions designed to directly increase the social networks of patients with psychosis. Searches of five online databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, Embase), hand searching of grey literature, and both forward and backward snowballing of key papers were conducted and completed on 12 December 2014. Trial reports were included if they were written in English, the social network size was the primary outcome, participants were ≥ 18 years old and diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.

Results

Five studies (n = 631 patients) met the complete inclusion criteria. Studies were from different countries and published since 2008. Four trials had significant positive results, i.e. an observable increase in patients’ social network size at the end of the intervention. The interventions included: guided peer support, a volunteer partner scheme, supported engagement in social activity, dog-assisted integrative psychological therapy and psychosocial skills training. Other important elements featured were the presence of a professional, and a focus on friendships and peers outside of services and the immediate family.

Conclusions

Despite the small number and heterogeneity of included studies, the results suggest that interventions directly targeting social isolation can be effective and achieve a meaningful increase in patients’ networks. Thus, although limited, the existing evidence is encouraging, and the range of interventions used in the reported trials leave various options for future research and further improvements. Future research is needed to test the findings in different settings, identify which components are particularly effective, and determine to what extent the increased networks, over time, impact on patients’ symptoms and quality of life.

Submitter

Marcy Wilhelm-South

Purdue University

Publication Title BMC Psychiatry
Volume 15
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0684-6
URL https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-015-0684-6
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Kimberly Anderson; Neelam Laxhman; Stefan Priebe (2018), "Can mental health interventions change social networks? A systematic review," https://habricentral.org/resources/62833.

    BibTex | EndNote

Tags
  1. Animal roles
  2. Interventions
  3. open access
  4. psychoses
  5. Social Isolation
  6. Social Networks
Badges
  1. open access