You are here: Home / Journal Articles / A Tinbergian review of self-injurious behaviors in laboratory rhesus macaques / About

A Tinbergian review of self-injurious behaviors in laboratory rhesus macaques

By Andrea Polanco

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Self-injurious behaviors (SIBs) are a welfare and practical concern in laboratory rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and may share a similar etiology to human SIBs. This review uses a Tinbergian perspective to investigate why rhesus monkeys perform SIBs. In addition to reviewing research specifically focused on rhesus macaque SIBs, this paper reports data on human SIBs to help explain the behavior in non-human primates. This review is broken into four distinct sections based on Tinbergen’s ‘four whys’ of behavior: phylogeny, ontogeny, causation, and function. The first section, phylogeny, presents a few studies that link SIBs to monoamine-related genes. Phylogeny of SIBs as a whole, however, is insufficiently researched in non-human primates, as data are scarce on at-risk primate species and heritable factors. The developmental section attributes SIBs to rearing experiences (e.g., isolation housing and surrogate rearing), history of stressful experiences (e.g., husbandry and research protocols), and at-risk life stages (e.g., adolescence). Together these two sections help explain the origin of SIB-vulnerable phenotypes. Next, the causation section looks at potential internal mechanisms (e.g., neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, hormones, and affective states), behavioral and psychological correlates of SIBs (e.g., stereotypic behaviors, floating limb syndrome, and cognitive inflexibility), and external stimuli (e.g., individual housing, outdoor housing, and environmental enrichment). Lastly, the function section utilizes data on human self-report to consider putative benefits of SIBs such as self-stimulation and coping with stress and/or perhaps neuropathic pain. It addition, this section considers how these behaviors may alternatively represent brain dysfunction. In the final discussion and conclusion, treatment implications inspired by each of the four whys are considered, as well as the merits of using Tinbergen’s approach to study abnormal behaviors.

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 179
Pages 1-10
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.003
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Evolution
  2. Functions
  3. Macaques
  4. ontogeny
  5. Self-injurious behavior