HABRI Central - Resources: Is behavioural enrichment always a success? Comparing food presentation strategies in an insectivorous lizard (Plica plica): About

The Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) is issuing a call for research proposals from institutions and organizations across the globe to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted interventions (AAI), both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Is behavioural enrichment always a success? Comparing food presentation strategies in an insectivorous lizard (Plica plica) / About

Is behavioural enrichment always a success? Comparing food presentation strategies in an insectivorous lizard (Plica plica)

By Inez Sukuna Januszczak, Zoe Bryant, Benjamin Tapley, Iri Gill, Luke Harding, Christopher John Michaels

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Staggering food availability through a delivery device is a common way of providing behavioural enrichment as it is usually thought to increase the amount of natural behaviour due to the unpredictability of the food source. Tree-runner lizards (Plica plica) are a Neotropical, scansorial, insectivorous species. We provided these lizards with an enrichment device that slowly released insect prey and tested its effect on the activity and frequency of a number of behaviours in comparison with a scatter control (where prey items were broadcast in the enclosure; standard food presentation for captive insectivorous lizards) and a non-feeding control. Both types of food increased activity and counts of several behaviours in comparison with the non-feeding control. However, we found the provision of the behavioural enrichment device led to a significantly lower frequency of almost all analysed behaviours in comparison with scatter control trials, mainly in behaviours associated with activity (unsuccessful strikes (=unsuccessful capture of prey) (p=0.004), locomotion (p=0.004), alertness (p=0.004) and the number of times a boundary in the enclosure was crossed ie. activity (p=

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 183
Pages 95-103
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.009
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Activity
  2. Behavior and behavior mechanisms
  3. Enrichment
  4. Lizards
  5. Reptiles