The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Finishing bulls have more synchronised behaviour in pastures than in pens / About

Finishing bulls have more synchronised behaviour in pastures than in pens

By Leena Tuomisto, Arto Huuskonen, Lauri Jauhiainen, Jaakko Mononen

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare the synchronisation of the lying, feeding and standing behaviour of bulls housed in an uninsulated barn and in a pasture. Dairy (Ayrshire and Holstein-Friesian) and beef (Hereford) bulls were housed in June-July in either partly bedded pens in an uninsulated barn (PEN bulls; five groups of four or five bulls with 6.4 or 8.0 m2/bull) or in a pasture (PAS bulls; five groups of four or five bulls with 680, 1000 or 1250 m2/bull). The PEN bulls were fed grass silage ad libitum. For concentrate supplementation both the PEN and PAS bulls received rolled barley 4.4 kg dry matter/animal/day. The behaviour of the bulls was observed for two 24-h periods. The animals were 15–17 months old during the observations. Instantaneous sampling with a 6-min sampling interval (IS-6 min) was used originally for collecting the data. Lying, eating and standing (=all other activities performed in a standing posture) were recorded during the IS-6 observations. The Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient was used as an index of behavioural synchronisation. It was calculated for each of the groups of four or five animals across 24 (IS-60 min) and 12 (IS-120 min) time points within a 24-h day to increase the independency of the data points. The Fleiss’ kappa coefficient was calculated in two ways: combining all three behavioural classes of each observation day (KFO) as well as separately for lying (KFL), eating (KFE), and standing (KFS). The results were analysed using a selected multilevel linear mixed model. The IS-60 min (presented in the abstract) and IS-120 min results were essentially identical. PAS bulls displayed more synchronised behaviour than the PEN bulls (P 

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 213
Pages 26-32
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.02.007
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal welfare
  2. Behavior and behavior mechanisms
  3. Bulls
  4. pastures
  5. pens
  6. shelters