The Federal Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) (DDA) defines assistance animals to include dogs or other animals that are trained to assist a person with a disability to alleviate the effect of the disability and to meet standards of hygiene and behaviour that are appropriate for an animal in a public place. The Federal Court of Australia Full Court has read this definition widely to include a selftrained dog that has not been accredited or trained by a recognised specialist disability animal training association. Considering an estimated four million Australians could claim to have a disability under the wide definition of disability in the DDA, and the extremely low bar to establish that an animal provides assistance to a person with a disability, the impact of these laws are significant and are generating substantial concerns to government, industry and the disability community.
|Publisher||The University of Queensland|
|Institution||The University of Queensland|
|citation||Harpur, Paul, Verreynne, Martie-Louise, Pachana, Nancy, Billings, Peter and Brent Ritchie (2016). Disability assistance animals or not? Problems in policy and practice workshop: summary and scoping discussion paper. T.C. Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland.|
|Cite this work||
Researchers should cite this work as follows: