The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / How much is enough? The amount of straw necessary to satisfy pigs’ need to perform exploratory behaviour / About

How much is enough? The amount of straw necessary to satisfy pigs’ need to perform exploratory behaviour

By Lene J. Pedersen, Mette S. Herskin, Björn Forkman, Ulrich Halekoh, Kristian M. Kristensen, Margit B. Jensen

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Since 10 years, EU-legislation states that ‘pigs must have permanent access to sufficient quantity of material to enable proper investigation and manipulation activities’. While much research has focused on which materials ‘enable proper investigation and manipulation activities’, little has been done to determine what constitutes ‘sufficient quantity’ and ‘permanent access’. Based on the hypothesis that a reduced level of oral manipulation of pen mates reflects an increased level of fulfilment of pigs’ behavioural need to explore, we chose oral manipulation of pen mates as target behaviour. In three batches, we investigated the relation between oral manipulation of pen mates and amount of straw provided to the pigs in order to identify the amount of straw, where additional provision of straw did not reduce the occurrence of oral manipulation of pen mates any further. From 30 to 80kg body weight, the pigs were housed in groups of 18 animals in pens (5.48m×2.48m) with concrete floor (1/3 solid, 1/3 drained and 1/3 slatted). Pens were cleaned manually twice a week and fresh uncut straw was provided daily onto the solid part of the floor. In the first batch, 48 pens were assigned to either 10, 500 or 1000g straw per pig and day (N=16 pens per straw allocation). A reduction in oral manipulation of pen mates was found when pigs were given 500 compared to 10g (P=0.03), but no further reduction when increasing the straw amount to 1000g was detected. In the second and third batch, a total of 96 pens were assigned to 8 treatments (10, 80, 150, 220, 290, 360, 430 or 500g straw per pig and day) (N=12 pens per straw allocation). There was a linear relation between straw amount and oral manipulation of pen mates, the latter being reduced from 8.4% to 6.7% of active time, when pigs were provided 500 compared to 10g (P=0.01). Based on the concept of bioequivalence, 387±10g straw per pig and day was identified as the amount of straw where a further increase in straw provision did not reduce the oral manipulation of pen mates. Thus, the straw amount identified to meet pigs’ need to explore was close to 400g straw per pig and day. A criterion of permanent access (defined by a minimum of 1l (approx. 60g) unsoiled straw in a pen 24h after allocation) was achieved at lower levels of straw provision, especially during the initial weeks of the growing period.

Publication Title Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume 160
Pages 46-55
ISBN/ISSN 0168-1591
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.008
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Abnormal behavior
  2. Activity
  3. Pigs
  4. Straw
  5. welfare