The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Are Baby Animals Less Appetizing? Tenderness toward Baby Animals and Appetite for Meat / About

Are Baby Animals Less Appetizing? Tenderness toward Baby Animals and Appetite for Meat

By Jared Piazza, Neil McLatchie, Cecilie Olesen

Category Journal Articles

Three studies investigated whether thoughts and feelings generated by baby animals might oppose appetite for meat. A prestudy established babyness as an important factor predicting moral concern for farmed animals. Study 1 showed that presenting images of baby animals, versus adult animals, as the source of meat reduced appetite for meat, but this effect was weak and found exclusively among women. Study 2 replicated and extended study 1 using a larger sample and two new animal sources. Study 3 included a no animal comparison condition, and found greatest levels of reduced appetite for meat when the meat source was presented as a baby animal, as opposed to an adult animal or with no visual indication of the animal source. A meta-analysis of the results using Bayes factors revealed considerable cumulative evidence in favor of the hypothesis that images of baby animals temporarily reduce women’s appetite for meat. In contrast, the evidence for men was less strong. Our results highlight a tension within some omnivores between caring for baby animals and appetite for meat.

Publication Title Anthrozoös
Volume 31
Issue 3
Pages 319-335
ISBN/ISSN 0892-7936
DOI 10.1080/08927936.2018.1455456
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Appetite
  2. Human-animal interactions
  3. Meat.
  4. morality
  5. tenderness