The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / “Animals Like Us”: Identifying with Nonhuman Animals and Support for Nonhuman Animal Rights / About

“Animals Like Us”: Identifying with Nonhuman Animals and Support for Nonhuman Animal Rights

By Courtney N. Plante, Stephen Reysen, Sharon E. Roberts, Kathleen Gerbasi

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

While anthropomorphizing nonhuman animals has been shown to increase identification with them and, by extension, concern for their wellbeing, little research has directly tested whether identifying with nonhuman animals is similarly associated with concern for their wellbeing. We tested hypotheses related to this premise across three cross-sectional studies. In study 1 (n = 224), we tested the hypothesis that therians—a group of people who self-identify with nonhuman animals, show greater concern for nonhuman animal rights than non-therian furries—people with a fan-like interest in media featuring anthropomorphized animal characters. In study 2 (n = 206), we further tested this hypothesis using implicit and explicit measures of identification with nonhuman animals to predict behavioral intentions to support nonhuman animal rights. In study 3 (n = 182), we tested the generalizability of our findings in a sample of undergraduate students. Taken together, the studies show that explicit, but not implicit, identification with nonhuman animals predicts greater support for their rights. The implications of these findings for research on anthropomorphism and animal rights activism are discussed, as well as the limitations of these findings and possible avenues for future research.

Publication Title Anthrozoös
Volume 31
Issue 2
Pages 165-177
ISBN/ISSN 0892-7936
DOI 10.1080/08927936.2018.1434045
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal rights
  2. Attitudes
  3. Human-animal interactions
  4. identity
  5. morality