You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Use of conjoint analysis to weight welfare assessment measures for broiler chickens in UK husbandry systems / About

Use of conjoint analysis to weight welfare assessment measures for broiler chickens in UK husbandry systems

By S. M. Haslam, S. C. Kestin

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

For the purposes of farm animal welfare assessment, Farm Assurance Schemes and enforcement of animal welfare legislation, a requirement arises for a unitary welfare score which may be the amalgamation of several animal welfare measures. In amalgamating measures, weighting to reflect the importance of the individual measures for animal welfare is desirable. A study is described in which conjoint analysis was used to collect and evaluate expert opinion to weight a number of welfare assessment measures for the importance of each to broiler welfare in UK husbandry systems. The statistically combined opinion of the experts consulted revealed the weighting factors of the welfare assessment measures selected, with respect to the importance for bird welfare, to be: 0.26 for mortality levels on the growing unit; 0.24 for the level of leg weakness; 0.16 for the level of hock burn; 0.14 for stocking density; 0.10 for enrichment provision; and, 0.10 for the level of emergency provision. Criteria for selection of welfare assessment measures for use in the field, and level of agreement between experts consulted for the study, are discussed. It is concluded that weightings of welfare assessment measures by expert opinion, using conjoint analysis, might be used in the construction of a welfare index for assessment of broiler welfare on-farm. Such an index should not be considered as a 'gold standard' for welfare measurement but as an evolving standard for welfare assessment, based on current knowledge.

Date 2003
Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 12
Issue 4
Pages 669-675
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
Language English
Author Address Division of Farm Animal Science, School of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK. sue.haslam@bris.ac.uk
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Analysis
  2. Animal husbandry
  3. Animal rights
  4. Animal welfare
  5. Assessment
  6. Birds
  7. British Isles
  8. Chickens
  9. Commonwealth of Nations
  10. Developed countries
  11. Europe
  12. Fowls
  13. Great Britain
  14. Meat animals
  15. Methodologies
  16. OECD countries
  17. peer-reviewed
  18. Poultry
  19. United Kingdom
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed