The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness / About

Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness

By E. Ratschen, E. Shoesmith, L. Shahab, K. Silva, D. Kale, P. Toner, C. Reeve, D. S. Mills

Category Journal Articles

The Covid-19 pandemic raises questions about the role that relationships and interactions between humans and animals play in the context of widespread social distancing and isolation measures. We aimed to investigate links between mental health and loneliness, companion animal ownership, the human-animal bond, and human-animal interactions; and to explore animal owners’ perceptions related to the role of their animals during lockdown.

A cross-sectional online survey of UK residents over 18 years of age was conducted between April and June 2020. The questionnaire included validated and bespoke items measuring demographics; exposures and outcomes related to mental health, wellbeing and loneliness; the human-animal bond and human-animal interactions.

Of 5,926 participants, 5,323 (89.8%) had at least one companion animal. Most perceived their animals to be a source of considerable support, but concerns were reported related to various practical aspects of providing care during lockdown. Strength of the human-animal bond did not differ significantly between species. Poorer mental health pre-lockdown was associated with a stronger reported human-animal bond (b = -.014, 95% CI [-.023 - -.005], p = .002). Animal ownership compared with non-ownership was associated with smaller decreases in mental health (b = .267, 95% CI [.079 - .455], p = .005) and smaller increases in loneliness (b = -.302, 95% CI [-.461 - -.144], p = .001) since lockdown.

The human-animal bond is a construct that may be linked to mental health vulnerability in animal owners. Strength of the human-animal bond in terms of emotional closeness or intimacy dimensions appears to be independent of animal species. Animal ownership seemed to mitigate some of the detrimental psychological effects of Covid-19 lockdown. Further targeted investigation of the role of human-animal relationships and interactions for human health, including testing of the social buffering hypothesis and the development of instruments suited for use across animal species, is required.

Date 2020
Publication Title PLoS One
Volume 15
Issue 9
Pages e0239397
ISBN/ISSN 1932-6203
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0239397
Language English
Author Address Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom.Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Adults
  2. Age
  3. Animals
  4. Bonds
  5. Covid-19
  6. Cross-Sectional Studies
  7. Distance
  8. Humans
  9. Infections
  10. Mental health and well-being
  11. Middle Aged Adults
  12. open access
  13. Pandemics
  14. Pneumonia
  15. surveys
  16. United Kingdom
  17. Virus diseases
  1. open access