HABRI Central - Resources: We Say "Tomato," They Say "Woof": The Argument for Abandoning "Provocation" in Dog Bite Statutes: About

The Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) is issuing a call for research proposals from institutions and organizations across the globe to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted interventions (AAI), both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / We Say "Tomato," They Say "Woof": The Argument for Abandoning "Provocation" in Dog Bite Statutes / About

We Say "Tomato," They Say "Woof": The Argument for Abandoning "Provocation" in Dog Bite Statutes

By Phyllis Coleman

View Link (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

When a dog bites, state statutes impose liability on his owner for the resulting injuries and/or label the nonhuman animal "dangerous."

Submitter

Marcy Wilhelm-South

Purdue University

Date 2016
Publication Title U. MEM. L. REV
Pages 72
URL https://works.bepress.com/phyllis_coleman/13/
Language English
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal welfare
  2. Bites and stings
  3. Dogs
  4. Health
  5. Mammals
  6. open access
Badges
  1. open access