The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Artistic freedom or animal cruelty? Contemporary visual art practice that involves live and deceased animals / About

Artistic freedom or animal cruelty? Contemporary visual art practice that involves live and deceased animals

By E. Coleman, R. Scollen, B. Batorowicz, D. Akenson

Category Journal Articles

This paper examines a selection of 21st-century international examples of exhibited visual artworks involving live or deceased animals. It seeks to reveal the risks and benefits of unique encounters with animals through art and to consider the ethical implications of artwork deploying animals. Australian and international animal protection laws are not explicit when it comes to the sourcing of animals for art nor for the direct inclusion of animals in artworks. This lack leads to a variety of artistic practices, some considered ethical while others are viewed as controversial, bordering on animal cruelty. Artwork selection is determined by a focus on high-profile artists who intentionally use animals in their practice and whose reputation has been fostered by this intention. The study provides insight into how the intentional use of ethically sourced animals within art practice can be a method of addressing hierarchal human-animal imbalances. Further, this study identifies unethical practices that may be best avoided regardless of the pro-animal political statements the artists put forward. Recommendations of how to better determine what is an acceptable use of animals in art with a view to informing legal guidelines and artistic best practice are presented.

Date 2021
Publication Title Animals
Volume 11
Issue 3
Pages 14
ISBN/ISSN 2076-2615
Publisher MDPI
DOI 10.3390/ani11030812
Language English
Author Address School of Creative Arts, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, QLD 4350,
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Analytics
  2. Animal roles
  3. Animals
  4. Animal welfare
  5. Anthrozoology
  6. APEC countries
  7. Art
  8. Australasia
  9. Australia
  10. Commonwealth
  11. Culture
  12. Developed countries
  13. Entertainment
  14. Ethics
  15. Government
  16. Guidelines
  17. humanities
  18. Law and legal issues
  19. Laws and regulations
  20. Methodologies
  21. Nations
  22. Oceania
  23. OECD countries
  24. open access
  25. Psychiatry and psychology
  26. regulations
  27. social anthropology
  28. Social psychology and social anthropology
  29. Social sciences
  30. Techniques
  31. Veterinary sciences
  1. open access