You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Challenges and paradoxes in the companion-animal niche / About

Challenges and paradoxes in the companion-animal niche

By P. D. McGreevy, P. C. Bennett

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles

By definition, the companion-animal niche demands merely that animals must provide companionship. At first glance, this may seem easy enough, but the forces that contribute to success in this niche are complex. Indeed, success as a companion is rarely measured in terms of biological fitness, and empirical measures of the breeding value of stock remain elusive. The challenges in the niche are manifold and reflect the need for companion animals to show behavioural flexibility, an attribute variously labelled compliance, tolerance, and even forgiveness. The borders of the niche are blurred and there is often negligible communication between buyers and suppliers of companion animals. In addition, demand for a given phenotype is subject to considerable flux. Paradoxically, companion animals may be victims of their own success. We value the social feedback they provide and yet often leave them alone for lengthy periods. There is an inherent tension between the desire to share the company of these animals and the reality that some humans find an animal's need for social contact, and indeed many species-specific behaviours, unacceptable. Also, the animal-sense of owners may be declining, reflecting reduced community exposure to animals in non-companion contexts, such as on farms and as modes of transport. Often, in the case of dogs, the companion-animal niche is occupied by a breed that was developed to work in a specific role that required endless energy and high reactivity. We select for conformation and movement in what were once working animals and yet many owners reject animals for behavioural traits that were subject to scarcely any primary selection. Since neutering of companion animals is, for many excellent reasons, now so common, the genes of outstandingly suitable pets are routinely lost to the gene pool. Companion animals may be living longer and yet, as they age, the dog-human relationship can shift diametrically. Senior dogs often become less appealing to and yet more dependent on, and needful of attention from, their owners. In Australia, urban companion-animal ownership per capita is declining in tandem with falls in living space. Despite this reduced demand, the pet industry uses positive imagery and targeted research to promote pet acquisition, helping to maintain a situation in which supply generally exceeds demand. This results in the annual euthanasia of thousands of excess animals in shelters and pounds. The pet industry also motivates owners to be consumers so it is unsurprising that expenditure on pets in Australia is rising. Sometimes food is promoted as a means of demonstrating affection. In many developed nations, unfortunately, pet owners have the resources to respond to marketing (among other forces) by overfeeding animals, often to the point of obesity. Obesity is considered to be a significant welfare problem for companion dogs. In summary, it seems that these shifts and growing paradoxes are making the companion-animal niche more challenging than ever. Perhaps science will help make the niche more predictable, but this alone will not guarantee the welfare of the animals that occupy it.

Date 2010
Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 19
Issue Supplement
Pages 11-16
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
Language English
Author Address Faculty of Veterinary Science (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Animal anatomy
  2. Animal behavior
  3. Animal genetics
  4. Animal nutrition
  5. Animal physiology
  6. Animal reproduction
  7. Animal rights
  8. Animal science
  9. Animal welfare
  10. Australasia
  11. Australia
  12. Body condition
  13. Body mass
  14. Breeding
  15. Commonwealth of Nations
  16. Conformation
  17. Consumers
  18. Developed countries
  19. Dogs
  20. Domestic animals
  21. Domestication
  22. Draft animals
  23. Euthanasia
  24. Farms
  25. Fat
  26. Feedback
  27. Fitness
  28. Genes
  29. Livestock
  30. Mammals
  31. Marketing
  32. obesity
  33. Oceania
  34. OECD countries
  35. peer-reviewed
  36. Pets and companion animals
  37. phenotypes
  38. Primates
  39. shelters
  40. specificity
  41. tolerance
  42. traits
  43. urban areas
  44. Working animals
  1. peer-reviewed