You are here: Home / Journal Articles / A hypothetical strategy for the objective evaluation of animal well-being and quality of life using a dog model / About

A hypothetical strategy for the objective evaluation of animal well-being and quality of life using a dog model

By D. B. Morton

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

In this paper I describe a hypothetical strategy for assessing poor and good welfare with the aim of making a judgement about an animal's quality of life. The concepts discussed here may also contribute to the notion of what makes 'a life worth living'. The strategy involves attributing scores to positive and negative aspects of an animal's well-being, using predefined categories and a simple scoring rote, and then summating these scores into an overall welfare score. The strategy incorporates a mathematical calculation that has certain mathematical biases to help ensure that any animal suffering is not excessive. I draw attention to some limitations of the proposed strategy and stress that such mathematical scoring systems cannot be used simplistically. Nevertheless, the proposed strategy could be refined, tested and validated to assist decision-making by those with a duty of care to the animal concerned.

Date 2007
Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 16
Issue Supplement
Pages 75-81
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
Language English
Author Address School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. d.b.morton@bham.ac.uk
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal rights
  2. Animal welfare
  3. Evaluation
  4. peer-reviewed
  5. Quality of life
  6. scoring systems
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed