The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Ballot Measures and Subversion of Direct Democracy: Initiatives to Outlaw Aerial Wolf Killing in Alaska / About

Ballot Measures and Subversion of Direct Democracy: Initiatives to Outlaw Aerial Wolf Killing in Alaska

By Alexander Simon, Steven C. Clark

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Activists often utilize ballot measures to protect wildlife. However, state executive branches may employ a variety of means to subvert direct democracy. We examine some of these tactics via a case study of two nearly identical ballot initiatives that were intended to outlaw the aerial killing of wolves in Alaska. In the first case, the language that appeared on the ballot was created by an executive branch sympathetic to the measure. In the second case, the ballot language was created by an executive branch opposed to the measure. In the first case, the ballot language accurately communicated the intent of the initiative and it passed. In the second case, it did not communicate the intent of the initiative or pass. Moreover, in the second case, the Palin administration utilized public funds to persuade voters not to support the initiative.

Date 2019
Publication Title Society & Animals
Volume 29
Issue 3
Pages 287-308
ISBN/ISSN 1568-5306, 1063-1119
DOI 10.1163/15685306-00001544
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal rights
  2. Democracy
  3. Environment
  4. wildlife
  5. Wolves