The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit close

You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Optimisation of Scores Generated by an Online Feline Health–Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Instrument to Assist the Veterinary User Interpret Its Results / About

Optimisation of Scores Generated by an Online Feline Health–Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Instrument to Assist the Veterinary User Interpret Its Results

By Vinny Davies, Jacqueline Reid, E. Marian Scott

Category Journal Articles

Using methodology previously described for the dog health-related quality of life (HRQL)
tool (VetMetricaTM), the aim was to optimize the scores profile of a comparable feline
online HRQL instrument for monitoring HRQL in cats, to assist in its interpretation.
Measuring HRQL helps quantify the impact of disease and its treatment on well-being,
aids clinical decision making and provides information in clinical trials. In Study 1, using
data collected from previous studies, scores generated for three domains of HRQL
(Vitality, Comfort, Emotional Well-being) in healthy cats were normalized using standard
statistical techniques of logit transformation and T-scores, such that the average healthy
cat has a score of 50 in all three HRQL domains. Using normalized scores from
healthy and sick cats, a threshold score of 44.8 was determined, above which 70%
of healthy cats should score. Study 2 determined the Minimal Important Difference (MID)
in normalized score that constituted a clinically significant improvement in each domain.
Three methods were tested in order to determine the MID, with the final choice made
based on statistical and clinical considerations. Thresholds of 5, 7.5, and 5 were chosen
for the three HRQL domains representing Vitality, Comfort and Emotional Well-being,
respectively. This study makes available a means of displaying HRQL scores from an
online application in an easily interpretable manner and quantifies a clinically meaningful
improvement in score. To illustrate the practical application of these developments, three
case examples are presented. Example 1 illustrates the raw and normalized scores for a
group of overweight cats enrolled in a Feline Weight Management Programme. Example
2 shows three groups of osteoarthritic cats, each with different severity of disease.
The third is an elderly, un-well cat whose HRQL was recorded over time, specifically
to facilitate end of life discussion between owner and veterinary clinician.


Marcy Wilhelm-South

Purdue University

Date 2021
Publication Title Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Volume 7
Pages 11
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.601304
Language English
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  1. Animal roles
  2. Cats
  3. Health status
  4. Mammals
  5. open access
  6. Pet owners.
  7. Pet ownership
  8. Pets and companion animals
  9. Quality of life
  10. Veterinarians
  1. open access