You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Were there royal herds? Understanding herd management and mobility using isotopic characterizations of cattle tooth enamel from Early Dynastic Ur / About

Were there royal herds? Understanding herd management and mobility using isotopic characterizations of cattle tooth enamel from Early Dynastic Ur

By T. L. Greenfield, A. M. McMahon, T. C. O'Connell, H. Reade, C. Holmden, A. C. Fletcher, R. L. Zettler, C. A. Petrie

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

During the third millennium BC, Mesopotamia (the land between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, in modern Iraq-Syria), was dominated by the world's earliest cities and states, which were ruled by powerful elites. Ur, in present-day southern Iraq, was one of the largest and most important of these cities, and irrigation-based agriculture and large herds of domesticated animals were the twin mainstays of the economy and diet. Texts suggest that the societies of the Mesopotamian city-states were extremely hierarchical and underpinned by institutionalised and heavily-managed farming systems. Prevailing narratives suggest that the animal management strategies within these farming systems in the third millennium BC were homogenous. There have been few systematic science-based studies of human and animal diets, mobility, or other forms of human-animal interaction in Mesopotamia, but such approaches can inform understanding of past economies, including animal management, social hierarchies, diet and migration. Oxygen, carbon and strontium isotopic analysis of animal tooth enamel from both royal and private/non-royal burial contexts at Early Dynastic Ur (2900-2350 BC) indicate that a variety of herd management strategies and habitats were exploited. These data also suggest that there is no correlation between animal-management practices and the cattle found in royal or private/non-royal burial contexts. The results demonstrate considerable divergence between agro-pastoral models promoted by the state and the realities of day-to-day management practices. The data from Ur suggest that the animals exploited different plant and water sources, and that animals reared in similar ways ended up in different depositional contexts.

Date 2022
Publication Title PLoS One
Volume 17
Issue 6
Pages e0265170
ISBN/ISSN 1932-6203
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0265170
Author Address Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.The Saskatchewan Isotope Laboratory, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.National Horse Racing Museum Palace Street, Newmarket, Suffolk, United Kingdom.University of Pennsylvania, Near Eastern Languages & Civilizations, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Agriculture
  2. Animals
  3. Cattle
  4. Diets
  5. open access
  6. peer-reviewed
Badges
  1. open access
  2. peer-reviewed