The HABRI Foundation is calling for research proposals to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted activity or therapy, both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / The influence of losing or gaining access to peat on the dustbathing behaviour of laying hens / About

The influence of losing or gaining access to peat on the dustbathing behaviour of laying hens

By A. Wichman, L. J. Keeling

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed under

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

This study investigated the influence of being reared with or without access to peat as well as the effects of losing or gaining substrate access on the dustbathing behaviour of young, domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). There were four treatments, based on the period of time chicks had access to peat during rearing: (i) always (LL), (ii) never (NN), (iii) from 0 to 6 weeks of age (LN) and (iv) from 6 weeks of age onwards (NL). Observations on the number and length of dustbaths performed were made for six days with birds aged six weeks and 50% of the birds either lost or gained access to litter. The birds then remained in the same treatment conditions until 16 weeks of age, at which point the same behavioural observations were repeated. NL birds (which had just gained access to peat) were found to be quicker than LN birds (which had just lost access to peat) to perform a dustbath during the first observation period. A significant difference was seen in the variation of the duration of the dustbathing bouts; both LL and NL birds varied less in the lengths of their bouts than NN and LN birds over both observation periods. Hence, early rearing environment had less effect on birds' dustbathing behaviour than current access or lack of access to litter. The irregular dustbathing pattern exhibited by birds that dustbathe without litter could be a sign of frustration; an indication that dustbathing without litter - unlike dustbathing in litter - does not provide the required feedback.

Date 2009
Publication Title Animal Welfare
Volume 18
Issue 2
Pages 149-157
ISBN/ISSN 0962-7286
Language English
Author Address Department of Animal Environment and health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 234, SE-532 23 Skara, Sweden. Linda.Keeling@hmh.slu.se
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal rights
  2. Animal welfare
  3. Birds
  4. Chickens
  5. Egg production
  6. Feedback
  7. Fowls
  8. peat
  9. peer-reviewed
  10. Poultry
  11. variation
Badges
  1. peer-reviewed