To Protect or to Kill? Environmental Contingent Self-Worth Moderates Death Prime Effects on Animal-Based Attitudes
Licensed according to this deed.
Category | Journal Articles |
---|---|
Abstract |
Lifshin et al. found that death primes increased support for killing animals, suggesting that the killing of animals serves a terror management function. The present research adds to this by suggesting that protecting animals can also serve a terror management function when people see such behaviors as culturally valuable. In three studies (N = 765), environmental contingent self-worth (ECSW) moderated the effect of death primes on attitudes toward animals. Attitudes toward animals also mediated the effect of a death prime on increased power-based invulnerability for those with low ECSW and decreased power-based invulnerability for those with high ECSW (Study 3). Finally, we found little support that death primes influenced beliefs regarding human-animal superiority (Study 1 and 2) or similarity (Study 2). Our findings therefore provide partial support for past terror management research and further the understanding regarding how to promote more benevolent human-animal relations. |
Date | 2023 |
Publication Title | Pers Soc Psychol Bull |
Pages | 1461672231160652 |
ISBN/ISSN | 0146-1672 |
DOI | 10.1177/01461672231160652 |
Author Address | Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK. |
Additional Language | English |
Cite this work |
Researchers should cite this work as follows: |
Tags | |
Badges |