HABRI Central - Resources: To Protect or to Kill? Environmental Contingent Self-Worth Moderates Death Prime Effects on Animal-Based Attitudes: About
 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / To Protect or to Kill? Environmental Contingent Self-Worth Moderates Death Prime Effects on Animal-Based Attitudes / About

To Protect or to Kill? Environmental Contingent Self-Worth Moderates Death Prime Effects on Animal-Based Attitudes

By S. Fairlamb, A. E. Stan, K. Lovas

View Resource (HTM)

Licensed according to this deed.

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Lifshin et al. found that death primes increased support for killing animals, suggesting that the killing of animals serves a terror management function. The present research adds to this by suggesting that protecting animals can also serve a terror management function when people see such behaviors as culturally valuable. In three studies (N = 765), environmental contingent self-worth (ECSW) moderated the effect of death primes on attitudes toward animals. Attitudes toward animals also mediated the effect of a death prime on increased power-based invulnerability for those with low ECSW and decreased power-based invulnerability for those with high ECSW (Study 3). Finally, we found little support that death primes influenced beliefs regarding human-animal superiority (Study 1 and 2) or similarity (Study 2). Our findings therefore provide partial support for past terror management research and further the understanding regarding how to promote more benevolent human-animal relations.

Date 2023
Publication Title Pers Soc Psychol Bull
Pages 1461672231160652
ISBN/ISSN 0146-1672
DOI 10.1177/01461672231160652
Author Address Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Fear
  2. Human-animal relationships
  3. mortality
  4. open access
  5. Violence
Badges
  1. open access