HABRI Central - Resources: Assessing preferences and motivations for owning exotic pets: Care matters: About

The Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) is issuing a call for research proposals from institutions and organizations across the globe to investigate the health outcomes of pet ownership and/or animal-assisted interventions (AAI), both for the people and the animals involved. To learn more, visit https://habri.org/grants/funding-opportunities/ close

 
You are here: Home / Journal Articles / Assessing preferences and motivations for owning exotic pets: Care matters / About

Assessing preferences and motivations for owning exotic pets: Care matters

By Anna Hausmann, Gonzalo Cortés-Capano, Iain Fraser, Enrico Di Minin

View Link (HTM)

Licensed according to this deed.

Category Journal Articles
Abstract

Understanding drivers of demand for exotic pets may help inform adequate conservation strategies to address unsustainable trade. Here, we used a best-worst scaling approach to understand the variety of preferences and motivations for owning exotic pets. Respondents (316 from 33 countries) preferred exotic pets that were captive-bred, had rare aesthetic features, and were common in the wild and abundant in the market. Species that were at risk of extinction, in short supply, sourced from the wild, and under trade restrictions were the least favoured by respondents. Feelings of care, such as attachment, affection, nurture, as well as curiosity and being passionate about the species, were dominant motivations for pet keepers. Respondents were willing to support the conservation of species in the wild. Our findings highlight that relational dimensions are among the most important aspects influencing decisions to own exotic pets. Certification systems of origin that supports animal welfare and conservation may help consumers support sustainable trade in exotic pet species. However, attention should be paid to challenges throughout the supply chain and not to incentivize consumers' preferences for rare genetic features as this may pose a risk to the conservation of species in the wild. When planning conservation initiatives and policies, considering relational dimensions may provide novel insights to better foster meaningful expressions of care with animals in the wild, as opposed to animals as exotic pets. Fostering care, as a normative human sense of kinship with non-humans, could help channeling “demand for ownership” towards “stewardship relations” with nature.

Submitter

Marcy Wilhelm-South

Purdue University

Date 2023
Publication Title Biological Conservation
Volume 281
Pages 11
Publisher Elsevier
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110007
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320723001076
Language English
Additional Language English
Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags
  1. Animal roles
  2. Ethics
  3. Exotic animals
  4. Human-animal relationships
  5. open access
  6. Pets and companion animals
  7. wildlife
Badges
  1. open access